Nosemonkey's EUtopia

In search of a European identity

October 3, 2005
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

112837211263051043

Right, logo’s been re-done to look smoother and nicer, as has the europhobit logo thing, not that anyone really cares. My only major issue now is the border in the comments section – anyone know how I can either get rid of the lines that stick up at the top or scrap the thing altogether? I can’t work it out…

October 3, 2005
by Nosemonkey
8 Comments

Short-termism

So, Austria’s screwing Turkey good and proper. Why? Well, Ostracised from �sterreich’s got some interesting theories about that:

“Despite appearances, I am pretty sure that Austrian chancellor Wolfgang Sch�ssel, who personally defines the foreign policy of the country, is actually in favour of full Turkish EU membership…”

Meanwhile Tony Blair and Jack Straw are trying to look like they’re making an effort (even though the UK presidency of the EU so far has been characterised by brief spurts of activity followed by complete backtracks and stalemate, so few reckon they actually care any more), Straw moaning that

“It�s a frustrating situation, but I hope and pray we may be able to reach agreement. We have a situation where 24 have decided to move forward and one has not. It is not the first time that has happened, and I am sure it will not be the last.”

Diddums – perhaps you shouldn’t have waited until the day before the talks were due to start before trying to sort it out, Jackie? It’s bad enough students handing essays in right on the deadline – but this is the future of an entire continent we’re talking about. A little bit of planning’s not too much to ask, surely?

And so the Empire of Priam – and as such the legendary origins of Rome and most of western European civilisation (not to mention the kingdom of Croesus, the origin of coinage and thus modern trade) – waits on the sidelines like the ugly girl in the turquoise crimpline dress, while 73% of Austrians and 53% of Europeans as a whole demonstrate their historical and cultural ignorance by declaring that “cultural differences” between Turkey and “Europe” are too big.

Update: Well would you look at that? A last minute deal…

October 2, 2005
by Nosemonkey
15 Comments

Looks different, eh?

This weekend has mostly been spent fiddling with HTML and CSS, and watching The West Wing. The results were mostly satisfying all round (Season 6 is a decided return to form).

Although I’m happy enough with it to roll it out, there are a few niggling problems with the code for this place – any help would be much appreciated. In Internet Explorer on PC the sidebars aren’t quite in the right place, and the title bar drops down a few pixels too low. In Firefox on the PC, the BlogAds box keeps shifting around the shop for no apparent reason. In both, the drop-down menu things in the sidebars don’t look right. There are doubtless more, and all are entirely due to my own lack of any kind of programming knowledge – this has been a case of trial and error.

Thanks once again to Chris for working out the initial template, and now – as I’ve had no chance to actually write anything this weekend (at least nothing that hasn’t involved vast numbers of triangular brackets), go check out the latest Britblog Roundup – good as ever, and in particular the Curious Hamster on Sir Ian Blair – the post I would have written this weekend had I not been overwhelmed with code stuff… The only addition I would make is that there is now a strong case to be made that Blair not only broke the law by not allowing the IPCC to check the scene of the Stockwell shooting, but also that he misled parliament – and either way the man is not fit to hold office any more. Then again, we knew that anyway…

September 30, 2005
by Nosemonkey
7 Comments

112809303513024958

Thanks, Gordon! Now I’m even less likely ever to be able to afford my own place! Cheers!

*Nosemonkey wanders off to ponder a future full of unstable and over-priced rental accommodation and slow starvation in old age due to inability to afford a proper private pension – assuming, of course, that terrorists, MRSA or the Metropolitan Police don’t kill him first*

September 30, 2005
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on 112809248904602451

112809248904602451

A Labour minister only acting after something’s appeared in the press? Surely not! Charles Clarke (slightly paraphrased):

“The article which appeared in today�s Sun newspaper about something about which before now I couldn’t care less has highlighted a number of important issues, most notably that this has now got media attention and so I need to look as if I give a shit and am doing something, or else our ratings will drop even further than they did yesterday after our goons were caught on camera manhandling a pensioner.

“I have today asked my department to look at the details of this particular case and some of the broader issues that it raises – most notably how our PR department didn’t pick up on this sooner and thus save us from having to scrabble around like morons while we desperately try and cover our arses.”

September 30, 2005
by Nosemonkey
9 Comments

112807896856547738

Europhobia’s new look preview excitement! – initial template courtesy of the lovely Chris, of qwghlm fame, with a few fiddles by me – so any HTML/CSS cock-ups are entirely my fault.

It’s still a work in progress (need to twig how to re-do these “Europhobit” things, get trackback up and running again, make sure that comments work properly, plus probably re-install the fancy drop-down menu things I’ve got, re-think the blogroll and archives and whack up a few other bits and bobs once I’ve integrated it to this URL etc. etc.), but what do you reckon so far? Any problems in specific browsers/operating systems (as I’ve only been able to check it in Safari on Mac OSX since fiddling this morning)? Any design issues? Anything else missing?

Suggestions/comments much appreciated – I’m hoping to have this up and running over here next week.

September 30, 2005
by Nosemonkey
1 Comment

Uzbek update

Following Uzbekistan blog day at the start of the month (my contribution here), trying to raise awareness of the decidedly unpleasant regime of Islam Karimov and calling for sanctions, someone has decided at last to act – and that someone is, as I had hoped, the EU.

The proposed sanctions won’t do much, being easily avoided – they appear simply to be “an embargo on exports … of arms, military and other equipment that might be used for internal repression”, but there is also to be another formal condemnation of the “excessive, disproportionate and indiscriminate use of force by the Uzbek security forces” (unlike the Met police, eh? Well, Britain did train the Uzbeks as well…)

There’s also some mention of cutting aid programmes and imposing Robert Mugabe-style visa limitations on members of Karimov’s regime. Even the people proposing them know that these are all largely symbolic actions – but at least they are actions and not merely words, which is all we’ve seen from our highly principled, anti-dictator leaders to date.

Even if all these particular sanctions mean is that Karimov will just buy all his arms from Russia instead and carry on with his show trials to excuse his massacres as before, it’s still a step in the right direction. There will doubtless be more on this over at the weblog of former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, later, as well as at the always top-notch Registan, Publius Pundit and Disillusioned Kid.

September 29, 2005
by Nosemonkey
7 Comments

112799691396237013

To make up for sweariness (which oddly prevents me, thanks to my office’s new web filters, from commenting on my own post in reply to the surprisingly classist anonymous Labour supporter who accused me of being a “chavista”), some genuinely good news – a truly superb Presidential candidate for 2008, one of single purpose, straight-talking, and who you can trust not to break any of his election promises. (via I forget, I’m afraid…)

September 29, 2005
by Nosemonkey
19 Comments

Bunch of fucking Labour cunting cunts

Arrest Detain an 82 year old under the Terrorism Act for shouting “nonsense” at someone talking nonsense?

I’m not sure I can express my views on this without swearing profusely, so I’m, glad other people already have. (Legal explanation, anger and surprisingly calm disgust in turn.)

For Christ’s sake, the guy’s been a member of the party for 60 years – that amount of loyalty surely deserves a little respect? Or doesn’t it work both ways?

Had I ever been a member of the Labour party, and had I not had the bollocks to quit already over their shameless shift to the authoritarian centre right, surely witnessing their thugs assault a pensioner would be the clincher? But then again, if you’re still a member of the party you’ve either got to have an insane amount of hope, faith and patience or simply not care about all the deaths and fuck-ups Blair’s caused. If the former, you’re deluded if you think your voice is ever going to be heard, as yesterday’s events prove; if the latter, you’re an abject cunt.

Party membership is never something I can approve of at the best of times – summons up all sorts of images of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, none of which are pleasant, which is why I have never and will never join any party – but Labour party membership today I cannot even slightly understand, and especially the continued membership of old Labour supporters.

Why? How can you approve of what they’re doing? How can you still think that this is the party you used to know? How can you still cling to the hope that they might, possibly, someday swing back towards the political ground they once occupied? How can you justify continuing to give them your money to enable them to pay hulking security guards to assault octogenarians?

I simply do not get it. I can’t come up with a single logical argument for it, nor any take on current Labour policy which could in any way be described as left-wing. Can anyone justify Labour party membership any more? Can anybody justify the Labour party?

Update: Heckler returns to hero’s welcome, while meanwhile,

“The Labour Representation Committee claimed there had been intimidation of delegates, allegations of corruption of the democratic process and ‘blatant gerrymandering’ of the conference agenda.

“It alleged that emergency resolutions to the conference had been excluded for ‘spurious’ reasons, that delegates received text messages from party officials telling them which way to vote and that speeches had been ‘planted’ by party officials.

“Labour MP John McDonnell, chairman of the committee, said: ‘Enough is enough – we cannot put up with this treatment any longer.

“‘We need a thorough independent investigation into the whole New Labour culture of intimidation, suppression of dissent and the gerrymandering of conference.'”

And this from an MP hardly known for his rebellious nature – until, that is, the most recent splurge of stupid legislation on gambling, terrorism, freedom of speech, ID, immigration, public private partnerships, judicial reform, etc. etc. etc.

September 29, 2005
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on 112798420807079160

112798420807079160

BBC Europe Editor Mark Mardell launches his weekly Europe roundup – coming to you every Thursday as from today. A bit short (both in length and on insight), but a moderately entertaining brief overview which could, in conjunction with Auntie’s daily European Press Review prove fairly useful.

September 29, 2005
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on 112798399825511129

112798399825511129

German elections: Yesterday’s coalition talks between Sch�der’s Social Democrats and Merkel’s Christian Union apparently went well, even if there’s still no obvious end in sight and no decision as yet over who will end up Chancellor. The closest British comparison – from what I can make out – would probably be if in 1974, rather than going to the polls again Labour and the Tories decided to team up, with Heath and Wilson trying to agree between them who would end up Prime Minister. All very odd, in ther words.

And if Schr�der and Merkel can’t come to an agreement? According to Der Spiegel, keep your eye on Edmund Stoiber, currently Governor of Bavaria and head of the Christian Social Union, Merkel’s major coalition partner. But if they’re honest, it’s still the case that no one knows what the hell’s going on.

September 28, 2005
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on Talking Turkey

Talking Turkey

(Sorry, my subbing skills seem to have gone out the window today – a truly terrible title…)

Voting has been postponed on extending Turkey’s association agreement with the EU to the ten new member states, although the European Parliament has voted that accession negotiations can start on October 3rd as planned. Just one more bit of confusion with the whole Turkish thing which has been knocking around for years – and yet another excuse for wildly differing interpretations of what the hell’s going on.

So, is Europe’s attitude to Turkey hypocritical, as one letter in the Guardian has it today? Is the Armenian Genocide question just an excuse, disguising latent racism and Islamophobia, as the Guardian’s second correspondant would seem to have it? Is it fair to bring up something from 1915, when the Turkish Republic was only founded in 1923, or should the focus be on current concerns, like alleged stifling of human rights and ongoing accusations of torture? (Not that Britain has any right to complain about torture these days, thanks to our delightful Home Secretary’s love of sleep deprivation, sexual humiliation and the extraction of fingernails with pliers… This may be why our support of Turkish membership threatens to cause so many problems with our European partners.)

As Turkey starts dropping hints it may give up on EU entry, sparking fears of a shift towards a more Islamic polity, there’s a good, if fairly lengthy, look at Turkey’s relationship with Europe over at the New York Times which helps point out some of the complexities, while the Economist has a superb intro to the problems of Turkish membership which may be worth a look first:

“Turkey first applied to join what was then the EEC in 1959. The two sides signed an association agreement in 1963 (implicitly accepting that Turkey could be a candidate); a customs union in 1995; and the EU officially accepted Turkey as a candidate for entry in 1999. Turkey has, in short, been asking to join Europe for so long that its application is starting to look old and moth-eaten�so much so that some diplomats and politicians seem to have forgotten the strategic reasons for entertaining it…

“Yet rejecting Turkey’s bid for membership would do little to solve the difficulties its application raises. The budget needs to be reformed whether Turkey is in or out. Europe’s economies must create more jobs whether or not Turkish workers get free movement of labour (which they probably won’t). Popular dissatisfaction with the EU exists regardless of Turkish membership. A majority of Europeans say they are undecided about Turkey, rather than actively hostile.”

Count me among the undecided. No matter what the outcome, there could be serious problems. Full EU membership, we get the introduction of a vast country with a vast, largely impoverished population, who would have full rights to live and work anywhere in the EU, and borders on some of the most unstable and dangerous nations in the world. The proposed “privileged partnership” and we risk fostering resentment and feelings that Europe is patronising our semi-European neighbour, which could help revive nationalist and/or radical Islamist political groups within the country, destabilising the one (relatively) sane and stable Islamic country we’ve got on our side. End all talk of membership, and the likelihood of a shift towards radical Islamist politics is even more likely, with all the concurrent increase in security risks that would threaten.

Is there a way out? Who knows? All I do know is that this seems a very odd area for Labour to suddenly rediscover the concept of “principle”…

September 28, 2005
by Nosemonkey
6 Comments

A plea for help

This blog is fucked. Its template is crammed full of shit. It doesn’t work consistently across all browsers for no apparent reason, and it has now got to the stage where I am utterly pissed off with it. As of today it also appears to be refusing to show new posts in Safari, meaning I can’t actually see what I’ve written this morning without entering the URL for the post manually. Which is hardly helpful.

I understand nothing of HTML or CSS beyond how to put in links and pictures, so am incapable of sorting it out.

So, who wants to help me redesign this bugger? I pretty much know what I want (basically the same with some tweaks and not fucked would be a good place to start) but have no idea how to achieve it. I’m also going to throw this open to suggestions – is there anything you, dear readers, would like to see done? Anything you want got rid of? Let me know.

I can offer little in the way of payment because I’m pretty much completely broke (vast amounts of entirely necessary yet extortionate expenditure recently, involving jewellery, hotels and intercontinental flights). You would, however, gain my eternal gratitude. And possibly a pint or two.