Nosemonkey's EUtopia

In search of a European identity

Comment Policy

All comments are welcome, and feel free to disagree as much as you like – just keep things civil, and show other commenters the same respect you’d like them to show you. It’ll keep things more pleasant.

Comments containing potentially libellous material may be subject to moderation or deletion, otherwise all will go up unedited, and are the responsibility of their original author.

However, please try to keep your comments on topic. If a post is about British politics, please refrain from trying to discuss your theories about other matters, or going off on long-winded sidetracks. If you’d like to debate a particular issue here, have a look through the recent posts and see if it’s already being discussed – if not, get in touch and I may write one on that subject to keep you happy. I’m nice like that.

If you go off-topic repeatedly, you’ll first be asked politely to stop – after that, your contributions may be subject to deletion. Not because I’m not a believer in free speech, but because it can prevent others from discussing the issues at hand.

Comments containing more than two links are automatically held in moderation to help prevent spam, as are any comments containing certain words and phrases that the site’s anti-spam software automatically updates from an open-source database of common spam terms.

If your comment has not appeared after a few hours, feel free to email nosemonkey [at] gmail [dot] com and I’ll have a look for it in the spam folder.


  1. You make an attempt to discredit Daniel Hannan’s comment about the administrative costs of the EU. I have a screen grab of the EC’s Better Regulation website from 12 February 2012 which I would send if I could. It says
    ‘The Commission’s Better Regulation strategy is aimed at measuring administrative costs and reducing administrative burdens. According to estimates, it would be possible to reduce administrative costs by as much as 25% by 2012. This would have a significant impact on the EU economy an increase in the level of GDP of about 1.5% or around or around €150 billion.’ regulation

    Now why would anybody be wrong to conclude that administrative costs are €600b? Since this is the EC’s own estimate, might well be considerably higher.

    You owe Mr. Hannan an apology.

  2. Michael Burrage,

    The Commission is refering to the administrative cost of doing business throughout the EU, and that reducing it can increase GDP activity through lower consuming costs and extra investment ressources (think of it as a multiplier).

    In no way, does the Commission says that administration of private and public companies cost €600bn (ie: 4x €150bn). Only that extra GDP output for the whole EU from reduced regulations could amount to 1.5% (that is 1.5% x €10000bn … which is an approximation value).
    Incidentally, reduced regulations does not just mean reduce EU legislation but also harmonisation of national regulations at EU levels : it’s an all-encompassing view.

    Finally, Danniel Hannan often conflagrates numbers in regards to the British economy and the costs of administering EU institutions.
    None of this apply in this instance, as the UK represents around 11% of the EU GDP, and EU institution administrative costs are around €5bn per year (0.045% of EU GDP or 4% of the EU yearly budget).

    Best regards,

  3. Hi there, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just curious if
    you get a lot of spam responses? If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  4. Strange that you should think that the EU is not corrupt. Perhaps you could also explain along with your assertions why the auditors have refused to sign off the books of the EU, every year ?

  5. Third paragraph: please try to keep your comments on topic

    As to your question about the EU accounts: – or you could, you know, make the minor effort of read the most recent post on this blog.

    There’s over a decade’s worth of material about the EU on this blog. Something for everyone. I suggest you try reading the archives.

    And if you don’t trust me: – they’ve been signed off by the European Court of Auditors for the last 8 years running.

    This really isn’t hard. Rather than demanding answers in the wrong place on some random (now retired) blog, why not try using a search engine to do some research? That’s what they’re there for.

    FFS. This is part of the reason why I quit blogging…

  6. 3. There’s no guarantee the big names likely available Johnny Cueto and Cole Hamels will help. Cueto just had his upcoming start pushed back from Tuesday to Friday for “extra rest,” and earlier, he missed a couple starts with general stiffness and elbow soreness. Hamels has a 2.96 ERA and has dominated the weak lineups in the NL East the past few seasons, but it’s worth noting he has a career 4.61 ERA in 30 interleague starts. I’m not sure you want to give up a couple of your best prospects for him.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.