Nosemonkey's EUtopia

In search of a European identity

June 1, 2006
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

Blog response time

Blog response time, example 56,798. Massive explosion at a major chemical works in the middle of the night. BBC News website reports at 1:03am (though it will have been updated by the time you read this in the morning). Blogs report at 12:44am and 12:52am. Doubtless there are more.(I guess that’s what you’d call “citizen journalism”, even though I hate the phrase…)

May 24, 2006
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

The future of Europe (again)

As Serbia accepts Montenegrin independence, and the EU makes encouraging noises, is it true, as an interesting OpenDemocracy article has it, that “in much of east-central Europe, the European Union tends to be seen as an updated version of an earlier communist utopia (“From each according to their ability, to each according to their need”), but � for better or worse � the carrot of European integration is the best hope anyone has for long-term stability in Europe’s troubled deep south”?

Certainly the potential for EU membership has helped inspire Turkey to push forward with liberalisation, and has been cited as a positive force in countries throughout the former Soviet bloc (irritating Russia no end), but how long will it take to get our eastern neighbours up to an acceptable standard – both economically and socially?

Can the promise of future EU membership overcome the highly localised identies – not usually national, more based on clan systems, language, religion, ethnicity and myriad other differences – that seem endemic throughout the eastern half of the continent (including the tiny Montenegro)?

Having already failed to prepare existing EU members, institutions and procedures for the 10 new member states that joined two years ago (the ongoing constitutional dilemma), as well as an internal rethink, should the EU also look again at its apparent policy of hinting that membership is possible for anyone, or is the ideal just as important as the reality? Would it even be possible to come up with a coherent EU enlargement policy with such diverse countries – and would it even be sensible?

Either way, something needs to be done.

May 23, 2006
by Nosemonkey
5 Comments

The end of an era

Norman Balon, landlord of the infamous Coach & Horses in Soho, has retired.

Shame. Shame, I say. For those unfamiliar:

“Mr Balon, 79, has told more people to drink up and leave than Jeffrey Bernard drank large vodka-ice-and-sodas at his barside during the decades he wrote Low Life, his celebrated Spectator column… [Bernard] had to compete in conversation with, among others, the unshameable Daniel Farson; Tom Baker, popping in from a voice-over; Conan Nicholas, the man who invented cat-racing; or with David Wright, the poet…”Norman Balon was really invented by Richard Ingrams, when editor of Private Eye, from which William Rushton and Peter Cook and the rest came over the road for lunch each day… For 40 years, Private Eye has held its fortnightly lunches for informants and prominent people in a chill room upstairs… Immortality came in 1989 with Keith Waterhouse‘s play Jeffrey Bernard is Unwell, a sell-out with Peter O’Toole in title role and the pub interior as the set.”

The Coach has been the hub of some of the most fascinating fringe characters of journalism and the arts for decades – there can be few who have aspired to a bohemian lifestyle who have not drunk there during Norman’s tenure. Me? Yep, I aspired. I went for a job there once while I was a student – was offered a pint during the interview with Norman, but nerves were such that I spilled it all over his suit. He was, shall we say, unimpressed. I left forthwith, and didn’t dare return for three years…

May 22, 2006
by Nosemonkey
2 Comments

Miliband’s blog

Those lovely chaps at the Hansard Society want our opinion on Labour bright young thing and government minister David Miliband’s blog.Take the survey – but be nice. It may not have been the most interesting in the world, comments may have been censored to remove material deemed party political in the broadest sense, and it may have cost insane amounts of money to put up (£6,000? mine’s cost me nothing…), but if you can get over the dislike of our overlords that most people have these days, it was at least a positive step.

May 22, 2006
by Nosemonkey
7 Comments

Eurovision – promoter of unity, promoter of discord

It’s no secret that Eurovision voting patterns say as much about international relations as they do about the quality of the songs.

Although occasionally – as with the UK’s dire 2004 entry’s failure to pick up any points at all – politics is blamed when it’s actually the fault of the music, there are certain definite patterns: former Soviet states have a tendency to vote for Russia; former Yugoslav states vote for their neighbours, as do the Scandinavians.

When these voting patterns are not followed, based as they are upon the votes of the people of those nations, they can often reveal much about the shifting attitudes of European to their neighbours. Although sometimes – as when Portugal unusually failed to vote for its neighbour Spain on Saturday – they can just indicate that the music’s utter rubbish.

This year, however, some have pointed fingers at the song contest itself for inspiring a real-world political crisis, rather than acting as the focus for the European public’s political attitudes.

Serbia & Montenegro was the only former Yugoslav republic not to make it through to the finals, and the free national publicity they can provide. The reason? The inability of the Serbs and Montenegrins to agree on a representative.

After a Montenegrin boy band won the vote, the Serbs threw a strop – hurling bottles at the poor saps and forcing them to flee for their lives from the stage (a tactic we should have used on this year’s God-awful British entry) – and demanded a new contest. The Montenegrins refused – and after a heated spat the country was forced to withdraw from the competition in an ongoing argumentative stalemate.

Yesterday, the day after the song contest itself, there was a referendum on Montenegrin secession – and on a record turnout of over 86%, it seems that Europe will now have a new country on its hands.

Yet another new country from the wreckage of the former Yugoslavia after its bloody and vicious civil war.

Yet another new country from the former Yugoslavia which has been born with some fairly serious issues with its next-door neighbours and erstwhile fellow countrymen.

Now who was that idiot who blathered on about how “if music be the food of love, play on”? Then again, if we’re unlucky and this seccession provokes a fresh outbreak of the kind of violence we saw in Yugoslavia during the 1990s, the full quote could prove prescient:

If music be the food of love, play on;
Give me excess of it, that, surfeiting,
The appetite may sicken, and so die.

The appetite for unity beween Serbia and Montenegro, it would seem, has already died – and music appears to have been one of the crucial catalysts in its sickening.

May 19, 2006
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

More Gordon Brown subtlety

From today’s Metro freebie:

Chancellor goes on a power tripGordon Brown plunged a car into a stunt pool yesterday and joked: “A great sense of power – you don’t get that as Chancellor.” Mr Brown made the crack as he opened a new underwater film stage at Pinewood Studios, near Slough. He was shown the £1.5 million set-up used to film The Da Vinci Code. The 6m (20ft) deep pool will be used for stunts in the new Bond film, Casino Royale.

Oh no, he’s not getting increasingly desperate to become Prime Minister, is he?

May 18, 2006
by Nosemonkey
1 Comment

Brown, not bitter…

Missed this – interesting interview with Gordon Brown in last Sunday’s Washington Post. Some edited highlights:

Many in the Labor Party say Blair should announce a date to leave office. Your response?We have just had very difficult elections. People want to look at how the Labor Party can best prepare for the future. Tony Blair has said he does not wish to stand at the next election and that he wants to organize a stable and orderly transition.

Are you satisfied with the way Blair is handling the transition?

You’ve got term limits in the U.S. We have no term limits. It’s a matter for him and the Labor Party. It’s not really a matter for me at all.

What’s the next step for you? It sounds like there is a lot of pressure for the prime minister to set a date to go.

He has said he wants a stable and orderly transition, and people from the party are asking him: What does that mean?

Some say Blair is setting up a candidate against you.

These things are said. I’ve just got to get on with my job. I think things will work themselves out.

But you want to be prime minister, right?

I’ve been in this job long enough to know, first of all, that it’s what you do rather than which position you hold that matters. And equally, that you don’t tempt fate by making rash announcements.

It’s getting fairly tricky to avoid tripping over all these hints Brown keeps dropping… When is the move going to be made, and who – considering Brown is desperate to keep his hands clean and avoid Heseltine’s fate – is he going to get to make it for him?