Nosemonkey's EUtopia

In search of a European identity

May 19, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-19

links for 2007-05-19

May 18, 2007
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

links for 2007-05-18

May 17, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-17

links for 2007-05-17

May 16, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-16

links for 2007-05-16

May 15, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-15

links for 2007-05-15

May 14, 2007
by Nosemonkey
6 Comments

Spain: absolute bastards

You see, the thing about the EU is that it’s first and foremost supposed to promote and facilitate free trade. Of course, as not every country in the world is a member of the EU, what it’s ended up being is a kind of free trade area. (Only not a perfect one, obviously, thanks to the vagaries of cross-border economics, the lack of a pan-EU single currency and such like.)

But one of the biggest, most damning criticisms of the EU is that the Single Market amounts to little more than a customs union, a zone of economic protectionism for EU member states, which is doing more than pretty much anything (well, bar the Common Agricultural Policy, perhaps) to screw the chances of developing nations to grow their own international trade and compete on the global stage.

Well, too little too late, perhaps, but in recent years the EU has been making some vague noises as if it’s going to try to rectify this situation. Most of which, it must be said, have been due to external pressure, such as the recent battle with China over EU restrictions on clothing imports, or the discussions with the US a year or so back, during which the Americans offered to drop their agricultural subsidies to US farmers if the EU would likewise drop the CAP. (Thanks to France’s reliance on the current CAP arrangements, unsurprisingly this cut no dice. But had the deal gone ahead, lefties world wide would have ended up in the amusing position of having to revise their hatred of George W Bush, because if that proposal had been accepted then it would have done more to alleviate global poverty than pretty much any agreement ever… Heads would doubtless have exploded in confusion.)

The major reason for this change of protectionist heart is that the World Trade Organisation has also ruled that the EU’s current elaborate system of deals with non-EU countries (largely the “ACP countries“) is illegal. Dubbed “preferential trade agreements”, they were largely (if unconsciously) modelled on the deals France got in at the EEC’s foundation to allow former French colonies access to European markets, but have the added benefit of artificially stabilising prices. Fine for rich European nations – cheaper food. Rather worse, however, for poor African farmers, desperately trying to find a market for their meagre goods.

So, thanks to the WTO, all these preferential trade agreements have to be replaced with “economic partnership agreements” (EPAs) by the end of this year. The idea, coming out of the Cotonou Agreement of 2000, is to gradually remove all the trade preferences and barriers that have developed between the EU and the 80-odd ACP countries over the last 30 years, to allow much more free economic development, and a much more equal trading partnership. And, to ensure that the WTO doesn’t get annoyed again, the EPAs will be available to every developing nation in the world.

With only a few exceptions, such as arms and munitions (and, I believe, sugar and rice for some reason), this will finally begin to create a much more free system of global trade, and – hopefully – begin to allow less developed countries to get a few benefits from globalisation for a change.

BUT.

Thanks to Spain (and the EU’s continued veto system, which the failed constitution was to rectify) the entire deal could be screwed, because our Iberian friends have seemingly only just realised – seven years after the Cotonou Agreement was made – that, erm, Spain grows a lot of bananas, and so do quite a few of the developing nations that the new EPAs are being set up with.

Yes, yes it does seem like Spain may have completely missed the point of “free trade” here. But they are also threatening to use their veto if they don’t get some kind of exemption for bananas (elections next year, and they don’t want to risk losing the farming vote). This will, of course, open the floodgates to every other EU member state to start demanding revisions and exemptions for their own pet products. Which will, of course, defeat the whole object of the thing.

Still, I have a solution. Scrap nation states’ vetoes. Scrap nation states. Scrap elections. Appoint me first President for Life of the European Union, and I’ll sort everything out. It’s the only way we’re ever going to get anything done, by the looks of things. The EU needs countless reforms, both major and minor, but every time it looks to be getting somewhere some uppity member state starts getting all selfish on us, usually for electoral reasons, and screwing everything up.

It can’t just be me who’s getting annoyed with this childishly petty short-termism of our dear elected representatives, can it? These new arrangements could have a massively beneficial impact on some of the poorest countries in the world, but because a few over-subsidised farmers in the Canary Islands may be unable to compete on a level playing field, Spain’s prepared to sign the death warrant for countless poor subsistence labourers throughout the third world. I mean, I’m not much of a one for all this “Live8” and “Make Poverty History” nonsense, being far too cynical for all that, but really: what a bunch of absolute bastards.

May 14, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-14

links for 2007-05-14

May 13, 2007
by Nosemonkey
4 Comments

links for 2007-05-13

May 12, 2007
by Nosemonkey
3 Comments

Eurovision: please, please let France win

Les Fatales Picards are a work of absolute genius. That bald guy – perfect! Sadly no cheerleaders during the live finals, but still. Fantastic stuff – they’ve single-handedly revived my interest in pop music:


Update: Actually, sod that – maybe Ukraine… Genius also (though in a rather more contrived way, for which I’ll deduct points – France still my favourites…):

Update 2: But more importantly, why the hell is the German entry all about ruling the world? Should we be getting nervous? (And unless my ears deceived me, in their appeal for votes they said something along the lines of “we conquered you…” Erm…)

Update 3: The German entry’s lyrics. It IS all about ruling the world! Or maybe Angela Merkel. I’m not sure any more…

May 12, 2007
by Nosemonkey
2 Comments

links for 2007-05-12

May 11, 2007
by Nosemonkey
4 Comments

A load of Balkans

The aftermath of the collapse of Yugoslavia hardly needs much repeating, considering the more violent parts of it were on our tellies throughout the 1990s. What’s surprising, however, is the differing fates of the three largest countries to have emerged from the Yugoslav whole: Serbia, Bosnia and Croatia.

Why relevant? Well, because not only have peacekeeping forces been scaled back in Bosnia after 15 years, but today also sees Croatia host European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn as special guests at the final summit of the country’s presidency of the South East European Co-operation Process, while Serbia is currently combining political crises, movements against independence for Kosovo, and Russian interference with – from today – Chairmanship of the Council of Europe. And that’s before you even mention all the uncaptured war criminals running around.

So while Croatia has become a favourite holiday destination for the middle classes (and a halfway-decent football side) with a strong chance of entering the EU within the next few years and Bosnia has been largely forgotten, Serbia shows every sign of being just as mad as ever.

To put Serbia’s Council of Europe chairmanship in some perspective, this is the body that is designed to uphold human rights across the continent and beyond – it, rather than the EU, is the body responsible for the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights (not to be confused with the European Court of Justice).

Yet Serbia – the figurehead of Europe-wide human rights for the next six months – is not only still complicit in hiding war criminals from the International Criminal Court, but has also just elected a hard-line nationalist as speaker of their parliament – a hard-line nationalist who only got the job of temporary leader of his party because the party’s president is currently on trial in the Hague for crimes against humanity.

Belgrade 2.0 has a good roundup of reactions to this appointment, as does Fistful. Hell, the Council of Europe itself (much like the EU) has criticised the situation:

“I have learned with consternation of the election of Tomislav Nikolic, member of a political party run by an indicted war criminal, to the post of Speaker of the Serbian Parliament. In this context, I want to recall that co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia is not optional, but a legally-binding obligation and a commitment that Serbia undertook when joining the Council of Europe.

I very much regret Mr Nikolic’s first comments concerning the European institutions. In a crucial moment when Serbia needs more than ever to strengthen its co-operation with such institutions to stake its future on democracy, the defence of human rights and the rule of law, the words of the new Speaker sound as a worrying echo of a turbulent past.

For a member state due to take on the Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers in two days, Mr Nikolic’s election is a burden on Serbia’s ability to carry out its task.”

Of course, this only happened a few days ago, and to cancel Serbia’s chairing of the Council of Europe on such short notice may well have seemed a bit off. But the thing is, it’s not just that Serbia’s been politically unstable for years, but since the elections back in January it’s been obvious not only that the place isn’t quite right in the head, but also that the nutty nationalists of the nicely named Serbian Radical Party had come out on top in the vote. And let’s face it, if the years since 1991 have taught us anything, its that the last thing the former Yugoslavia needs is more nationalism…

Surely there must have been some way to skip Serbia’s chairmanship? – especially as today also marks Montenegro’s accession to the Council, following its independence from Serbia last year (something to which many Kosovans also, perhaps unsurprisingly, aspire – something the US is currently promoting at the UN).

The difference between Croatia’s post-civil war path and that of Serbia has never been more apparent. Croatia is looking beyond its borders to the international community, aspiring to EU membership, and is doing well; Serbia is still inward-looking and full of petty jealousies, enviously coveting more power and more enforced unity while resenting its minorities (be they Muslims, the Albanians of Kosovo, the Roma, whatever) and building up its anger at Montenegrin independence.

Bar Belarus, Serbia is, in other words, one of Europe’s most unstable and nutty countries – its future path entirely unpredictable, and its violent, genocidal past seemingly not regretted. But for the next six months it’s to be an international symbol of human rights.

You’ve got to love this continent sometimes…

Evening update: Phew – “Serbia’s pro-democracy parties have agreed to form a new power-sharing government, Parliament’s speaker said Friday, an arrangement that would exclude anti-Western ultranationalists who had supported Slobodan Milosevic”

May 11, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on links for 2007-05-11

links for 2007-05-11

May 10, 2007
by Nosemonkey
Comments Off on Where’s a Francis Urquhart when you need one?

Where’s a Francis Urquhart when you need one?

In honour of Blair’s little announcement (and Ian Richardson’s untimely death earlier this year), I’ve just started watching the superb House of Cards again. It really is excellent – and wonderfully timeless. Here’s a transcript of the opening monologue, with alterations only to pronouns, job titles and names, marked by square brackets…

Nothing lasts forever. Even the longest, the most glittering reign must come to an end.

Who could replace [him]? Plenty of contenders – old warriors, young pretenders.

[Gordon Brown], say, the [Chancellor]. Too old and too familiar, tainted by a thousand shabby deals.

[David Miliband] – too young and too clever.

[John Reid] – a bit of a lout, a bit of a bully-boy. Yes, it could well be [Reid].

[David Cameron], the people’s favourite. A well-meaning fool – no background and no bottom…

Of course, the wonderful thing about House of Cards is that none of them end up as PM.

Sadly for us, though, there’s no Urquhart waiting in the wings – and his modern-day, real-life equivalent as Chief Whip is the no-mark “Blair babe” Jacqui Smith. Something tells me the only way she’ll be entering Number 10 when Blair exits on 27th June is when she’s summoned so that Gordon Brown can sack her. Ho hum… (Still, the image of her chucking Nick Robinson off the Palace of Westminster roof garden’s one that’s got something going for it…)