-
Worth a read, if only for this: “despite their natural sympathy for the UK, many Czechs complain of being ignored by the British” – if we made an effort, a UK EU vision could happen
-
A very reasonable explanation. But if the amendment was designed for propaganda, why give them what they wanted, exactly?
-
The best response I’ve seen to the latest offshoot of Gordon Brown’s ill-considered (and repeatedly failed) obsession with generating a new kind of populist nationalism for the UK
-
Very nice final quote for all EU-based Russia-watchers… I love Putin – great value for money.
-
“It is not that the EU is unwelcome in our southern province… But there has to be a clear legal mandate for any such commitment — and this can only be achieved by getting the approval of the Security Council.”
-
Now this is interesting – the potential ramifications here are massive…
-
Sounds like a promising article, right? But this is worth reading only as an example of gloriously biased, partisan writing with precisely no analytical merit. Am I wrong to expect better from Der Spiegel?
-
I was looking for a profile of Berlusconi’s heir apparent, Gianfranco Fini (Italian election campaign’s kicking off), and this is ideal. Also Dutchman Filip Dewinter and Austrian Jorg Haider
-
Great analysis of the nature of Russian democracy by the last British Ambassador to the Soviet Union (and first British Ambassador to the Russian Federation). Tip-top.
-
A step in the direction of transparency at last. But why so little reporting on this after the (ongoing) MEP expenses scandal? The vote was two days ago – another example of dire EU communications…
links for 2008-03-12
March 12, 2008
4 Comments
Leave a reply →