{"id":497,"date":"2005-05-17T15:08:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-17T15:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/05\/17\/most-my-governments-since-1999\/"},"modified":"2005-05-17T15:08:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-17T15:08:00","slug":"most-my-governments-since-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/05\/most-my-governments-since-1999\/","title":{"rendered":"Most &#8220;my government&#8221;s since 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I always wonder how Her Majesty can bring herself to read out the nonsensical drivel she&#8217;s always handed for the state opening of parliament. This year&#8217;s speech also had the added sick-making factor of seeming to want to identify itself more than usual with old Brenda &#8211; Blair&#8217;s lot seem especially keen to remind the country that they are the Queen&#8217;s government after their shaky election performance.<\/p>\n<p>In a bored moment I decided to count up how many times her Maj was forced to refer to Blair and Co. as &#8220;my government&#8221;. In an even more bored moment, I decided to do some comparison. The last time that phrase was used as many times was back in <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/524733.stm\">1999<\/a>, where the poor dear had to associate herself with Blair&#8217;s lot 39 times. Back to Buck House for a few G&amp;Ts after that one, methinks&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Is there any significance to this, or just an example of piss-poor repetitive speechwriting on the part of Downing Street? Who knows &#8211; but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/cgi-bin\/semhtml_hl?DB=semukparl&amp;STEMMER=en&amp;WORDS=queen%20speech&amp;amp;amp;amp;ALL=&amp;ANY=&amp;PHRASE=queen%27s%20speech&amp;CATEGORIES=&amp;SIMPLE=%22queens%20speech%22&amp;SPEAKER=&amp;COLOUR=Red&amp;STYLE=s&amp;ANCHOR=61023-01_spnew3&amp;URL=\/pa\/ld199697\/ldhansrd\/vo961023\/text\/61023-01.htm#61023-01_spnew3\">the last Queen&#8217;s speech under a Tory government only used the phrase 14 times<\/a>, and they&#8217;re meant to be the royalists&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the Blair\/Brenda Queen&#8217;s Speech love-in tally, for anyone interested:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/cgi-bin\/semhtml_hl?DB=semukparl&amp;STEMMER=en&amp;WORDS=queen%20speech&amp;ALL=&amp;ANY=&amp;PHRASE=queen%27s%20speech&amp;CATEGORIES=&amp;SIMPLE=%22queens%20speech%22&amp;SPEAKER=&amp;COLOUR=Red&amp;STYLE=s&amp;ANCHOR=61023-01_spnew3&amp;URL=\/pa\/ld199697\/ldhansrd\/vo961023\/text\/61023-01.htm#61023-01_spnew3\">1996<\/a> &#8211; 14<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/ld199798\/ldhansrd\/vo970514\/text\/70514-01.htm\">1997<\/a> &#8211; 27<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/special_report\/1998\/11\/98\/queen_speech\/221003.stm\">1998<\/a> &#8211; 31<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/524733.stm\">1999<\/a> &#8211; 39<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/politics.guardian.co.uk\/news\/story\/0,9174,837857,00.html\">2000<\/a> &#8211; 22<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/politics.guardian.co.uk\/stateopening2001\/story\/0,10546,509805,00.html\">2001<\/a> &#8211; 22<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/politics.guardian.co.uk\/queensspeech2002\/story\/0,12595,839002,00.html\">2002<\/a>  &#8211; 23<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/3236220.stm\">2003<\/a>  &#8211; 27<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/4034947.stm\">2004<\/a>  &#8211;  28<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/4554309.stm\">2005<\/a>  &#8211;  33<\/p>\n<p>(And no, I can&#8217;t be bothered to go through counting the broken promises, or to trawl through the pre-internet speeches prior to 1996&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>Poor old Liz. She, after all, has to accept responsibility for all Blair&#8217;s crap as the only person in the country who actually made him PM, and something tells me she&#8217;s not exactly in a position to break with recent tradition and use her royal prerogative and get rid of the bastard. But you can tell from the look on her face she&#8217;s not happy. Gawd bless &#8216;er (etc.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I always wonder how Her Majesty can bring herself to read out the nonsensical drivel she&#8217;s always handed for the state opening of parliament. This year&#8217;s speech also had the added sick-making factor of seeming to want to identify itself &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/05\/most-my-governments-since-1999\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}