{"id":3029,"date":"2012-05-29T18:17:18","date_gmt":"2012-05-29T17:17:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/?p=3029"},"modified":"2012-05-29T18:17:18","modified_gmt":"2012-05-29T17:17:18","slug":"on-zizek-eliot-and-the-need-for-an-eu-reformation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2012\/05\/on-zizek-eliot-and-the-need-for-an-eu-reformation\/","title":{"rendered":"On \u017di\u017eek, Eliot, and the need for an EU Reformation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Slavoj_%C5%BDi%C5%BEek\">Slavoj \u017di\u017eek<\/a> often seems to exist to be controversial, and I certainly don&#8217;t agree with many of the details of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lrb.co.uk\/2012\/05\/28\/slavoj-zizek\/save-us-from-the-saviours\">his latest piece for the London Review of Books<\/a> on the Greece crisis (short version, as ever with old Slavoj: the usual consensus is wrong, and the far-left has all the best ideas). However, elements of one passage did stand out as worthy of futher consideration, as it tallies neatly with the way my thinking&#8217;s been going of late:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;In his <em>Notes towards the Definition of Culture<\/em>, T.S. Eliot remarked that there are moments when the only choice is between heresy and non-belief \u2013 i.e., when the only way to keep a religion alive is to perform a sectarian split. This is the position in Europe today. Only a new \u2018heresy\u2019&#8230; can save what is worth saving of the European legacy&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For \u017di\u017eek, the new heresy of choice is different to what it is for me. And what he considers worth saving of what it is he means to be the &#8220;European legacy&#8221; may well differ to my take. But for once I think I agree with him on this much &#8211; if the EU\/Europe is going to get through this crisis, it&#8217;s time for some radical new thinking.<\/p>\n<p>The old pro-EU \/ anti-EU \/ europhile \/ eurosceptic divisions have long been irrelevant sidetracks to the key aim of making Europe \/ the EU as pleasant and prosperous as possible for the people. These days, all those old divisions are obsolete.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve long been labelled as a &#8220;pro-EU blogger&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think this is true any more, if it ever was.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not pro-&#8220;EU&#8221;. Not pro- <strong>this<\/strong> EU. Not with all its flaws. Not with all its slowness to reform. Not with its continual lack of ability to tackle the key priorities facing the people of this continent.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This<\/strong> European Union is simply not good enough. <strong>This<\/strong> European Union needs to be replaced pretty much in its entirety. <\/p>\n<p><strong>This<\/strong> European Union has failed.<\/p>\n<p>The cause for this, as I see it, is simple &#8211; and long-term readers will find this no surprise:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; It&#8217;s not the anti-democratic technocrats that \u017di\u017eek blames.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s not the eurocrats and red tape so hated by the anti-EU right.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s the EU&#8217;s powerlessness in the face of the governments of the member states.<\/p>\n<p>You want more? Have more:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; insular, selfish &#8220;us first&#8221; attitude.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; refusal to work to anything longer than national-level electoral cycles.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; continual lack of long-term vision.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; continual abandonment or watering down of the few long-term plans that emerge for short-term gain.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; continual lack of investment in the system &#8211; not just in terms of money, but also attention.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; continual blocking of any and all efforts to increase democratic participation in pan-European bodies through fear of losing power and legitimacy.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; deliberate misrepresentation of what the EU is, does and can do.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; constant scaremongering about worst case scenarios if they don&#8217;t get their way.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; delight in claiming credit for everything good the EU does while blaming it for everything bad, even when it had little or nothing to do with that badness.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; constant emphasis on &#8220;<strong>the<\/strong> national interest&#8221;, even though they know that those interests increasingly frequently coincide with their neighbours.<br \/>\n&#8211; It&#8217;s those governments&#8217; continued refusal to face the fact that they are powerless to survive on their own.<\/p>\n<p>And those are just off the top of my head &#8211; feel free to add your own suggestions in the comments.<\/p>\n<p>To return to the \u017di\u017eek\/Eliot quote above, <strong>what the EU needs it not <em>reform<\/em> &#8211; it needs a <em>Reformation<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>(And yes, this all needs to be developed much further. For starters, I need to work out a new term to describe my position, as none of the old ones fit&#8230;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Slavoj \u017di\u017eek often seems to exist to be controversial, and I certainly don&#8217;t agree with many of the details of his latest piece for the London Review of Books on the Greece crisis (short version, as ever with old Slavoj: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2012\/05\/on-zizek-eliot-and-the-need-for-an-eu-reformation\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu-reform"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3029"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3030,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3029\/revisions\/3030"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}