{"id":286,"date":"2005-01-14T10:35:13","date_gmt":"2005-01-14T10:35:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/14\/eu-argument-explosion\/"},"modified":"2008-02-14T09:47:28","modified_gmt":"2008-02-14T09:47:28","slug":"eu-argument-explosion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/eu-argument-explosion\/","title":{"rendered":"EU argument explosion?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following yesterday&#8217;s decision by the European Parliament to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eupolitix.com\/EN\/News\/200501\/fe8f63a2-769b-4b49-a0cf-2e9b9c4f6029.htm\">approve the constitution<\/a>, things are kicking off a bit (even though the parliament&#8217;s decision actually means very little with all these referenda coming up).<\/p>\n<p>Blogging Labour MEP <a href=\"http:\/\/www.corbett-euro.demon.co.uk\/rep_diar.htm\">Richard Corbett<\/a>, co-rapporteur for the European Parliament&#8217;s report on the European Constitution, has done a piece for EU Observer <a href=\"http:\/\/euobserver.com\/?aid=18119&amp;rk=1\">trying to convince Eurosceptics to vote for the constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>He points out near the end that <i>&#8220;If it fails to be adopted, we can look forward to several years of bitter wrangling on the future structure of the enlarged EU.&#8221;<\/i> Personally I reckon that could be a very worthwhile exercise &#8211; rushing things through tends to lead to mistakes being made, but at the same time I think the point Mr Corbett is trying to make is the old one about &#8220;too many cooks&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Eurosceptic EU Serf &#8211; I suspect like many of his ideological kin &#8211; remains unconvinced by Corbett&#8217;s arguments, and provides <a href=\"http:\/\/eu-serf.blogspot.com\/2005\/01\/baffled-by-eurosceptics.html\">a handy point-by-point demolition job of the article<\/a>: <i>&#8220;So far each treaty we have signed has been a vehicle for further integration. Why should this document be any different? &#8230;The EU seems to work like a bicycle, it needs to continuously go forward. Perhaps we can all now fall off.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>North Sea Diaries notes that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.north-sea.net\/archives\/292\">a quarter of MEPs voted against<\/a>, while Martin at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ironies.blogspot.com\/\">Ironies<\/a>, a Eurosceptic blog I only found out about yesterday, points out that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ironies.blogspot.com\/2005_01_01_ironies_archive.html#110563187470511157\">a majority of three countries&#8217; MEPs voted against the constitution<\/a> &#8211; Britain, the Czech Republic and Poland. The <a href=\"http:\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/73378854-64b6-11d9-9f8b-00000e2511c8,dwp_uuid=d4f2ab60-c98e-11d7-81c6-0820abe49a01.html\">Financial Times article he links to<\/a> notes that 40 of 70 British MEPs voted against &#8211; where were the rest of them for such an historic vote?<\/p>\n<p>Not constitution-specific, <i>per se<\/i>, at Straight Banana Toby has, as promised, started a series of articles which should be worth a read: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.40k.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/sentimentality-1\">Sentimentality (1)<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.40k.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/sentimentality-2-european-parliament\">Sentimentality (2) &#8211; European Parliament vs House of Commons<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.40k.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/anti-auntie\">Anti Auntie<\/a> &#8211; a discussion of the perrennial Eurosceptic claim that the BBC is biased in favour of the EU.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps it is the length of these which has prompted <a href=\"http:\/\/eureferendum.blogspot.com\/2005\/01\/elephant-in-elephant-in-room.html\">EU Referendum&#8217;s latest attack on Toby<\/a> &#8211; including outing his real-world identity (bad form &#8211; and unecessary really, as it&#8217;s fairly obvious anyway). I am assuming that this must be an example of how &#8220;the Eurosceptic sites are dominating the high ground, displaying wit, humour and depth of coverage that is not matched by the Europhiles&#8221;, <a href=\"http:\/\/eureferendum.blogspot.com\/2005\/01\/hundred-grand.html\">as EU Referendum&#8217;s Richard North claims<\/a>. Personally, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a rather petty jab combined with a generalisation based on, well, not a lot of anything, really.<\/p>\n<p>As I have pointed out in a comment to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.losethedelusion.com\/blog\/2005\/01\/the_view_from_a.html\">Lose the Delusion&#8217;s post on North&#8217;s latest snipe<\/a>, it rather appears from his blogroll that North rarely bothers to read pro-EU blogs other than Straight Banana (which I&#8217;d say often displays wit and humour, although what with being run by one chap with a full-time job is unsurprisingly not quite so obsessive with its coverage), so quite where he gets this idea from I have no idea&#8230; Perhaps he may wish to elaborate at some point, although frankly I&#8217;m not too bothered &#8211; although North is evidently intelligent and knows his subject well, he has a tendency not so much to argue as to lecture, not so much to refute other arguments as to simply say &#8220;that&#8217;s wrong&#8221;. It reminds me a bit of my Dad over Christmas lunch&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>However, what North&#8217;s comments do (sort of) point out is that the eurobloggosphere (certainly the Anglophone part of it) does seem to be somewhat dominated by Eurosceptic voices. Of the fairly regular, non-official pro-EU lot who try and focus on the EU more than anything else, there&#8217;s really only here, Straight Banana and Lose the Delusion that I&#8217;m aware of &#8211; and until a few months ago Straight Banana was on its own. Anyone know of any more? Who has North been reading to get such a poor impression of the internet&#8217;s pro-EU voices?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following yesterday&#8217;s decision by the European Parliament to approve the constitution, things are kicking off a bit (even though the parliament&#8217;s decision actually means very little with all these referenda coming up). Blogging Labour MEP Richard Corbett, co-rapporteur for the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2005\/01\/eu-argument-explosion\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[41,178,49],"class_list":["post-286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu-constitution","tag-blogging","tag-eu","tag-european-parliament"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}