{"id":2835,"date":"2011-05-27T13:47:41","date_gmt":"2011-05-27T12:47:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/?p=2835"},"modified":"2011-05-27T14:28:41","modified_gmt":"2011-05-27T13:28:41","slug":"why-britain-leaving-the-eu-for-the-eea-or-efta-will-not-solve-any-of-the-anti-eu-crowds-complaints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2011\/05\/why-britain-leaving-the-eu-for-the-eea-or-efta-will-not-solve-any-of-the-anti-eu-crowds-complaints\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Britain leaving the EU for the EEA or EFTA will not solve any of the anti-EU crowd&#8217;s complaints"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s leave the EU and join the EEA or EFTA &#8211; Norway and Switzerland are doing fine without EU membership!&#8221; It&#8217;s a perennial argument of a surprisingly large number of anti-EU types, and I&#8217;ve been meaning to do a proper post on it for (literally) years. It is, needless to say, a nonsense argument based on a fundamental misunderstanding of Norwegian\/Swiss relations with the EU.<\/p>\n<p>Norway has oil. Switzerland\u2019s a tax haven. Both have far, far smaller populations than the UK, accounting for their far higher GDPs per capita (and hence relative prosperity). They are not comparable with Britain.<\/p>\n<p>Even if they were \u2013 both also have to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.efta.int\/eea\/eu-programmes\/application-finances\/eea-efta-budget.aspx\">pay in to the EU budget<\/a> proportionate to their economies. Norway currently pays <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eu-norway.org\/ARKIV\/newsarchives\/EEA_agreement_facts\/\">c.340 million euros per annum<\/a>. This is more than many EU member states &#8211; especially when you consider the fact that actual members get money back, reducing their net contributions.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, judging from this <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/europe\/8036097.stm#start\">chart of net contributions<\/a>, Norway would &#8211; if included in the chart &#8211; be about the 10th highest contributor to the EU budget, despite not being a member.<\/p>\n<p>Rough maths tells us that, all things being equal, as the UK&#8217;s GDP is approximately 5.7 times that of Norway&#8217;s, the UK would still need to contribute around 2 billion euros a year to the EU budget if part of the EEA\/EFTA. While having no say in what EU laws and regulations we&#8217;d still have to follow.<\/p>\n<p>Because both Norway and Switzerland also &#8211; without having any say in their formulation &#8211; have to abide by 80-90% of EU rules and regulations in order to be part of the Common Market. <\/p>\n<p>Because you know what you need for a Common Market to function? Common rules and regulations.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the whole reason *why* the EEC has been shifting down the path towards elements of political union over the last five decades \u2013 you need a certain amount of political harmonisation to enable functional, stable economic harmonisation. The lack of greater political cohesion (especially the lack of a common fiscal policy) is one of the major contributing factors to the current eurozone crisis, FFS.<\/p>\n<p>Also worth remembering \u2013 these \u201cwe\u2019d be better off in EFTA\/the EEA\u201d arguments used to have a third \u201clook how well so-and-so\u2019s doing\u201d country included: Iceland.<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t hear much about how well Iceland\u2019s doing in the EEA any more, do we?<\/p>\n<p>You see &#8211; it&#8217;s all very well saying &#8220;let&#8217;s leave the EU&#8221;. But if you&#8217;re advocating ditching the status quo you&#8217;d better have a pretty bloody well thought-through alternative plan.<\/p>\n<p>The vast, vast majority of EU withdrawalists, however, seem simply not to have done their research.<\/p>\n<p><small>(This originally posted as a comment <a href=\"http:\/\/liberalconspiracy.org\/2011\/05\/25\/isnt-it-time-for-a-referendum-on-europe\/#comment-272724\">here<\/a>, and now slightly modified with additional links)<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s leave the EU and join the EEA or EFTA &#8211; Norway and Switzerland are doing fine without EU membership!&#8221; It&#8217;s a perennial argument of a surprisingly large number of anti-EU types, and I&#8217;ve been meaning to do a proper &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2011\/05\/why-britain-leaving-the-eu-for-the-eea-or-efta-will-not-solve-any-of-the-anti-eu-crowds-complaints\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-eu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2835","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2835"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2835\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2838,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2835\/revisions\/2838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}