{"id":2460,"date":"2009-12-16T14:40:46","date_gmt":"2009-12-16T14:40:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/?p=2460"},"modified":"2009-12-16T14:42:11","modified_gmt":"2009-12-16T14:42:11","slug":"the-us-state-department-on-the-lisbon-treaty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/12\/the-us-state-department-on-the-lisbon-treaty\/","title":{"rendered":"The US State Department on the Lisbon Treaty"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve seen all the intra-European arguments about Lisbon (now in force for a full fortnight) &#8211; what we really need is some expert extra-European opinion. So ta very much to Philip H Gordon, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs at the US State Department, for his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.gov\/p\/eur\/rls\/rm\/2009\/133583.htm\">handy overview<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Key points?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <strong>&#8220;the role of Member States in decision-making is undiminished&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8220;The treaty&#8230; allows for some EU states which are at the forefront of defense cooperation to pursue greater harmonization of their defense apparatus <strong>without the limitations of those states who do not wish to participate<\/strong>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8220;the Lisbon Treaty represents a serious effort by our EU partners to <strong>streamline their policymaking process<\/strong>. We understand that, as with all efforts to reform complex institutions, this is a work in progress, and that it may take time for the new institutions to demonstrate their impact. Nevertheless, we hope that the changes brought by Lisbon will <strong>make the EU a stronger partner for the United States, and increase the role of Europe on the world\u2019s stage<\/strong>. We want the EU to be that stronger partner and we certainly intend to do our part to engage closely with the new institutions, but in the end their <strong>ultimate effectiveness will be determined by the will of EU Member States to invest in them<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well would you look at that? The United States doesn&#8217;t seem to think that Lisbon has brought about a superstate (as some of our more hysterical anti-EU friends <a href=\"http:\/\/eureferendum.blogspot.com\/2009\/12\/dispatch-from-occupied-country.html\">seem to believe<\/a>), but rather that it continues to allow EU member states a great deal of individual power and flexibility. And the United States also seems to believe that &#8211; as its supporters have consistently maintained &#8211; the Lisbon Treaty is primarily aimed at streamlining the union&#8217;s working methods.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and just to add to what anyone with half a brain and the ability to read has been saying about the thing, Assistant Secretary Gordon also notes the increased powers that are going to the European Parliament &#8211; that&#8217;d be the increased democracy bit that we&#8217;ve been going on about for the last few years.<\/p>\n<p>So, what&#8217;s the conspiracy that explains the US State Department echoing the EU&#8217;s own line on Lisbon &#8211; a line that&#8217;s supposedly dishonest propaganda designed to hide the true sinister intent of the treaty? Anyone?<\/p>\n<p><em>(Sorry for the blogging silence here of late, by the way &#8211; very, very busy for the last few weeks&#8230;)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve seen all the intra-European arguments about Lisbon (now in force for a full fortnight) &#8211; what we really need is some expert extra-European opinion. So ta very much to Philip H Gordon, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/12\/the-us-state-department-on-the-lisbon-treaty\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu","category-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2460"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2462,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460\/revisions\/2462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}