{"id":2184,"date":"2009-05-22T23:12:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-22T23:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/?p=2184"},"modified":"2010-11-01T21:09:35","modified_gmt":"2010-11-01T21:09:35","slug":"ukips-britain-paying-the-eu-40-million-a-day-claim-vs-the-real-costs-of-uk-eu-membership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/05\/ukips-britain-paying-the-eu-40-million-a-day-claim-vs-the-real-costs-of-uk-eu-membership\/","title":{"rendered":"UKIP\u2019s \u201cBritain paying the EU \u00a340 million a day\u201d claim vs the REAL costs of UK EU membership"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This has been on various <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestraightchoice.org\/leaflets.php?p=1282\">UKIP election leaflets<\/a>, so it&#8217;s evidently a claim they&#8217;re proud of &#8211; but does it stand up?<\/p>\n<p>Simple maths tells us that Britain paying \u00a340 million a day to the EU would mean an annual contribution of \u00a314.6 billion. However, the most recent Treasury Report on the UK&#8217;s EU budget contributions (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk\/d\/european_community_finances_2008.pdf \">PDF<\/a>) shows the following <strong>GROSS<\/strong> figures:<\/p>\n<p>2005 &#8211; \u00a312.5 billion<br \/>\n2006 &#8211; \u00a312.4 billion<br \/>\n2007 &#8211; \u00a312.5 billion<br \/>\n2008 &#8211; \u00a313.7 billion (estimated)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a313.7 billion divided by 365 = \u00a337.5 million, so UKIP are, at the very least, rounding up by \u00a32.5 million a day. Not much to round up by? That works out as \u00a3912,500,000 a year &#8211; I hope UKIP won&#8217;t be that out with their sums if they ever get near power&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But what about the rebate? What about the EU funds that are paid back to the UK in the form of things like the European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund and the like? What&#8217;s the <strong>NET<\/strong> contribution? (Again from the most recent Treasury report)<\/p>\n<p>2005 &#8211; \u00a33.6 billion<br \/>\n2006 &#8211; \u00a33.9 billion<br \/>\n2007 &#8211; \u00a34.6 billion<br \/>\n2008 &#8211; \u00a33.6 billion (estimate)<\/p>\n<p>UKIP deliberately using gross rather than net to make the situation seem worse is to be expected, of course, but still &#8211; let&#8217;s be generous and take the highest figure of \u00a34.6 billion &#8211; that&#8217;s still a lot of money, right? It may only work out as \u00a312.6 million a day, but that&#8217;s still a lot of money.<\/p>\n<p>Well, yes. But big figures are nothing without context, so let&#8217;s see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/UK_Budget\">how much the UK government spends on other things<\/a>:<centre><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/6\/65\/UKExpenditure.svg\/670px-UKExpenditure.svg.png\" width=\"550\" alt=\"UK government expenditure breakdown, shamelessly leeched from Wikipedia\" \/><\/centre><\/p>\n<p>Would you look at that? The UK may be forking out a net figure of around \u00a34 billion a year for EU membership, but at the same time we&#8217;re having to pay <strong>\u00a331 billion a year merely to service the INTEREST on our debt<\/strong>. That&#8217;s not *pay off* our debt &#8211; just keep up with the interest. Christ!<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the EU costs us 7.75 times LESS than it does to keep the international bailiffs from the door. (And that \u00a331 billion was BEFORE the most recent round of government borrowing, and before the collapse of sterling, both of which will have hugely escalated the figure for this year, as and when it&#8217;s released.)<\/p>\n<p>So, \u00a331 billion in interest payments, for which we see no return whatsoever, versus \u00a34 billion in payments to the EU, from which even its harshest critics must admit that we get *some* benefits &#8211; even if they will only admit to cheaper mobile phone charges or ease of travel. I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s not too bad a deal, in comparison.<\/p>\n<h2>Update, October 2010:<\/h2>\n<p>If you&#8217;re interested in this post, you may also be interested in:<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/06\/what-are-the-economic-costs-of-the-eu\/\">What are the economic costs of the EU?<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/06\/what-percentage-of-laws-come-from-the-eu\/\">What percentage of laws come from the EU?<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/12\/why-regulating-and-legislating-at-an-eu-level-is-almost-always-a-good-thing\/\">Why legislating and regulating at EU level is almost always a good thing<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/06\/the-dishonesty-of-the-eu-debate\/\">The dishonesty of the EU debate<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This has been on various UKIP election leaflets, so it&#8217;s evidently a claim they&#8217;re proud of &#8211; but does it stand up? Simple maths tells us that Britain paying \u00a340 million a day to the EU would mean an annual &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2009\/05\/ukips-britain-paying-the-eu-40-million-a-day-claim-vs-the-real-costs-of-uk-eu-membership\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[147,34,13,7],"tags":[189,185,178,43,97],"class_list":["post-2184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-of-2009","category-elections","category-eu","category-other-parties","tag-economics","tag-elections","tag-eu","tag-uk","tag-ukip"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2184"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2184\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2186,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2184\/revisions\/2186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}