{"id":1654,"date":"2007-10-01T11:30:13","date_gmt":"2007-10-01T11:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/10\/01\/eu-democracy-round-up\/"},"modified":"2008-02-02T13:14:09","modified_gmt":"2008-02-02T13:14:09","slug":"eu-democracy-round-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/10\/eu-democracy-round-up\/","title":{"rendered":"EU democracy round-up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s begun to get all exciting and hectic over at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\">dLiberation<\/a>, so what have you missed if you&#8217;re not popping over there already?<\/p>\n<p>First, academics being academics, a bit of a fight&#8217;s broken out, with the chaps behind deliberative polling &#8211; James Fishkin of Stanford and Robert Luskin of the University of Texas &#8211; coming back to defend themselves in vehemnet style: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/fishkin_luskin_lupia_1\">part 1<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/fishkin_luskin_lupia_2\">part 2<\/a>. More to follow soon &#8211; but it&#8217;s an interesting debate, and one that goes to the heart of the matter &#8211; if you claim a scientific basis for your methods, you need to defend them to scientific standards.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also an interesting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/democratic_deficit_myth\">defence of EU democracy<\/a> from Richard Corbett MEP, which makes a good case for the democratic deficit being a myth.<\/p>\n<p>Plus a quick look from me at Margot Wallstrom&#8217;s latest calls for a wide-ranging debate on the future of the EU which will apparently have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/preconditions_taboos\">&#8220;no preconditions, no taboos&#8221;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Then there&#8217;s a nice piece from Giles Merritt of the Friends of Europe on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/euroscepticism_save_europe\">the need for more euroscepticism<\/a>, with some well-considered arguments that struck quite a chord with me. In fact, it looks like there could well be a long-needed shift towards introspection and sensible, constructive criticism coming in to some sections of the pro-EU community. Which can only be a good thing. I hope.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, for those who still aren&#8217;t too sure what deliberative democracy is all about, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/blog\/dliberation\/purpose_of_deliberative_democracy_part1\">the first in a series of posts explaining the thing<\/a> from Dennis Thompson of Harvard and Amy Guttman of the University of Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>More coming soon &#8211; including, to redress the balance a bit &#8211; something from Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP and co-chair of the eurosceptic Independence and Democracy Group in the European Parliament.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s begun to get all exciting and hectic over at dLiberation, so what have you missed if you&#8217;re not popping over there already? First, academics being academics, a bit of a fight&#8217;s broken out, with the chaps behind deliberative polling &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/10\/eu-democracy-round-up\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,13],"tags":[177],"class_list":["post-1654","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-elsewhere","category-eu","tag-eu-reform"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1654","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1654"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1654\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}