{"id":1453,"date":"2007-01-12T07:59:03","date_gmt":"2007-01-12T07:59:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/01\/12\/an-eu-energy-roundup\/"},"modified":"2007-01-12T08:48:19","modified_gmt":"2007-01-12T08:48:19","slug":"an-eu-energy-roundup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/01\/an-eu-energy-roundup\/","title":{"rendered":"An EU Energy roundup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.eurotrib.com\/story\/2007\/1\/11\/18461\/1862\">Over at European Tribune<\/a>, courtesy of Jerome (who seems to know his stuff in this area), there&#8217;s a handy summary of reactions to the [tag]EU[\/tag]&#8217;s new energy plans (<a href=\"http:\/\/europa.eu\/press_room\/presspacks\/energy\/index_en.htm\">documents here<\/a>). He&#8217;s particularly handy explaining the conflict between [tag]environment[\/tag]al concerns and the need to help bolster (or should that be break up?) European energy markets, and on the impact these new proposals are likely to have:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;we are left with grand announcements and somewhat ambitious targets that go in the right direction, but an absolute impasse on the implementation, with the business world and the [tag]European Commission[\/tag] stuck on their mantra of &#8216;improving the Internal [tag]Energy[\/tag] Market&#8217; and &#8216;competition&#8217; despite the fact that these will &#8211; and already &#8211; achieve the exact opposite of what&#8217;s targetted.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Nothing will happen with this Commission. We&#8217;ll go on hearing the same arguments, I&#8217;ll spend more time deconstructing the same stupid articles, we&#8217;ll have more confrontations with Russia, with EDF or similar beasts that lead to nothing useful (but do cause a slow erosion of what made the French model work), and we&#8217;ll keep on moving towards the abyss.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s a pessimism that seems to be <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.ft.com\/brusselsblog\/2007\/01\/why_eon_and_its.html\">shared by the Financial Times<\/a> (on a blog I didn&#8217;t realise they had, but which looks rather good):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Despite all the huffing and puffing in Brussels, I think there is a zero chance that the Commission will end up blowing down the empires built by Eon, GdF and their peers across Europe&#8230; In fact, the correct way to look at this week&#8217;s events is to see the Commission&#8217;s demands as a purely tactical move. Brussels is hoping that it can scare member states and energy groups into accepting at least a more clearer separation of supply and networks&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here endeth the [tag]energy policy[\/tag] discussion, at least for now. Surprisingly interesting, though, the politics of business&#8230; Not an area I usually bother with, and certainly not one I understand &#8211; may be worth digging into a tad more. <small>(By the way &#8211; &#8220;more clearer&#8221;? Being used by a Financial Times journalist? Whatever next? &#8220;Most unique&#8221;?)<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at European Tribune, courtesy of Jerome (who seems to know his stuff in this area), there&#8217;s a handy summary of reactions to the [tag]EU[\/tag]&#8217;s new energy plans (documents here). He&#8217;s particularly handy explaining the conflict between [tag]environment[\/tag]al concerns and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/01\/an-eu-energy-roundup\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jcm.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}