Nosemonkey's EUtopia

In search of a European identity

President Blair… Christ alive…

Allow Tony Blair to become the EU’s first permanent president and I’m very likely to turn anti-EU again.

My feelings have already been succinctly summed up by Ari – a Finn, lest anyone get the idea this is yet another disillusioned Brit:

“Admittedly a lot of people in a lot of different countries know Tony Blair, which can’t be said for most possible candidates. Alas, he’s known for making a disastrous mistake and then not owning up to it, i.e. for showing bad judgment and not being particularly trustworthy. That sort of fame isn’t really a desirable quality in a candidate.”

Plus, of course, despite being supposedly very pro-EU, during his ten years in power Blair repeatedly failed to do anything to convince the country that being pro-EU is sensible – spending most of his time continuing John Major’s “wait and see” approach, despite being in a significantly stronger position than Major ever was throughout his time as PM. Had Blair wanted to he could, with his huge Commons majority and the inexplicable love the country had for him during his first term or so, have used his extraordinarily strong position to have pushed the EU on the UK, or at the very least to try and convince the country that closer engagement is a good plan. Instead, he did nothing.

This lack of action continued even on the continent. During the UK’s last (rotating) presidency of the EU, Blair was so invisible and uninvolved that one MEP even put out a jokey “Missing: The President of the European Union” press release. In fact, Blair’s only real engagement with Brussels during his time in office was to try to use the EU to bypass Westminster and force laws upon us that he never would have been able to get past his own MPs.

On top of that, of course, so hated is Blair in the UK that to have him as the EU’s official figurehead for (most likely) five years is merely going to further entrench British anti-EU feeling. Though he’d have been a good spokesman for the EU ten years ago, now he’d be like using Gary Glitter to advertise a primary school.

Not that the only other “name” candidate is much better. Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker is so rabidly, blindly pro-EU that he makes me feel decidedly uncomfortable, still advocating the kind of total political integration that most people gave up on back in the 70s, still advocating a “United States of Europe”. It’s hard to think of anyone with views more likely to drive British europhobes into a foaming rage, or to finally convince moderate eurosceptics that there really is no hope for the EU.

So who else is there? Well, what about Romano Prodi? He’ll most likely be available soon, judging by how his luck’s been failing him in Italy. As a former president of the European Commission he’s got the experience of running things at the top of the EU (during which period he oversaw the introduction of the Euro and expansion from 15 to 25 member states). As a two-time Prime Minister of Italy he has plenty of experience of juggling the multiple interests of tenuous coalitions, essential for anyone trying to keep all 27 EU member states happy while simultaneously trying to get agreements with non-EU powers.

Blair’s experience of diplomacy, in comparison, consists largely of two options: agree entirely with everything George Bush says, or launch an invasion. Jean-Claude Juncker’s, coming as he does from a principality only slightly larger than Greater London with a population less than that of Bristol, is non-existent. And yet these are the two front-runners for a position created largely to help in the EU’s diplomatic relations? Christ…


  1. Right now I believe most Italians (left-wingers included) would be appalled to see Romano Prodi get any job with more power than that of neighbourhood councilor.

    (New EU motto: “Everyone loves greener grass”)

  2. “Though he’d have been a good spokesman for the EU ten years ago, now he’d be like using Gary Glitter to advertise a primary school”

    That made me chortle! I quite liked Hague’s decription of the presidential motorcade turning up at No 10, as well.

  3. There are a lot more people on the continent who share Juncker’s idea than there are who think of Europe as a simple “super-EFTA” as the British do. In any case, “Phony Bliar” is out. And Prodi was described to me by a Commission official as “a provincial Italian politian who landed b y mistake in Brussels”

  4. I agree with the previous speakers, due to lack of success on both the European and the Italian fronts – and a complete lack of even the tiniest trace of charisma – Prodi is even less acceptable than Blair. I think Juncker would be OK, but I like Guy Verhofstadt of Belgium even more and I would support the latter’s candidacy any time (then again, I am among those who think Europe could do with a leader with balls and a vision, rather than a sense of “reality” (read: opinion polls and focus group results).

    As a compromise however, what about Anders Fogh Rasmussen? I think I could live with him as an EU president – sufficiently liberal and pro-EU, yet, as a Dane, bound to have a sense of “reality” too.

  5. Accepted – Prodi has his problems. Lots of them…

    If we’re talking Danes, though, how about Jens-Peter Bonde? Now THAT’d be interesting…

    It is rather odd just how few politicians there are who are known EU-wide. I mean, I’d struggle to name more than about eight or nine current EU heads of state (or equivalents where the head of state is purely symbolic) off the top of my head, and I’m interested in this sort of thing. Doesn’t bode well for the chances of an elected EU president…

  6. Pingback: Jon Worth » Blog Archive » Let’s all have a whinge at Blair

  7. Indeed, it is a problem that not many politicians are known EU wide. And if they are known it is only for some controversial opinion/behaviour…

    I don’t think a candidate from outside the eurozone would be acceptable in the end…that would also rule out any Danish candidate. Anyway, I have this slight feeling that the final decision on this will be made during a EU summit at 3am…

  8. Pingback: Stop Blair! « Kosmopolit

  9. European Tribune have set up a Stop Blair! petition. Please sign and propagate it.

  10. @Andreas: Fogh plans to hold a referendum on the Danish opt-outs – most notably on the euro – in September or October this year (and according to current polls, he would win that). This would mean Denmark could be a eurozone country by 2009, when the new EU president takes office.

  11. @Eulogist: That is of course true. But first he has to win the referendum…

  12. @Andreas: So far, a slight majority seems to be in favour, and the American credit crisis has not even unfolded to its full extent yet. We will see in six months time if sufficient numbers of Danes have discovered that the euro gives them better protection to its consequences than a (supposedly) independent krone. But anyway, IF Fogh wins the referendum, there is enough time left for him to get appointed EU president.

  13. Hi,
    I’m a journalist at France24. I’d like to use parts of this text on our web site,, which is based on content produced by bloggers. Please e-mail me if you don’t want us to reproduce your text. Best,

  14. Surely launching an invasion is agreeing with everythingthat george bush says.

  15. Pingback: The state of British EU news coverage | Nosemonkey’s EUtopia

  16. Pingback: J Clive Matthews (@Nosemonkey)

  17. Pingback: J Clive Matthews (@Nosemonkey)

  18. Pingback: J Clive Matthews (@Nosemonkey)